Who Cares If You’re A Composer?
.
Music is a social object. There, I said it. Music brings people together. Now dig some John Cage:
.
.
Pseudo-deep question: is it music?
.
Pseudo-official answer: who am I to judge?
.
It’s a trap. If you answer yes then you’re a middlebrow poser. If you answer no then it’s a wonder they let you graduate high school. But it doesn’t matter because John Cage doesn’t need your approval. He’s ahead of his time. He’s so advanced of a composer, you don’t even want to know.
.
Theoretical Music
.
In his essay Who Cares If You Listen? Milton Babbitt argues that composers should carry out their research in the sanctuary of the university. Of course, if you want to go on stage and bang around some kitchen appliances in a university setting, the safe environment comes at the expense of any chance of popular appeal. According to Babbitt, that’s okay because that’s how theoretical physics is developed and most people don’t understand that, right?
.
Right. But in 1958 most people understood the concept of going to the moon. So they understood the point of theoretical physics, if not the specifics. Even the most obscure research and development takes place to solve some type of problem, so what problems are being solved by theoretical music?
.
Opportunity Cost
.
Musicians have good reasons to avoid going to conservatory these days. Beyond the harsh truth that a degree in humanities is simply not worth the money, even if you have been dedicated enough to earn a full scholarship, do you really want to learn about music from people who don’t believe you should seek an audience?
.
Every time some indie band bores audiences with musical dreck that lacks confidence and clarity, or a pop artist wallows in gratuitous melismas and Autotune, or a hip hop artist yammers on about how rich they are, we are witnessing the dilution of three traditions at once. They are being diluted because they are failing to evolve.
.
Isn’t it the stated purpose of university research, or of any public support for the arts, to empower artists who inspire us with creativity and innovation? When the study of music takes place behind closed doors, when composers declare a monopoly on their knowledge so it can only be used to produce work that few people understand and even fewer people enjoy, something is wrong.
.
Ones and Zeros
.
The internet has made a ton of information available to a ton of people. What used to be distributed through a heirarchy can now be shared socially, which means that colleges and universities no longer have a monopoly on learning. What “art music” composers never want to admit is that music theory is not rocket science. Music theory does not need to be actively developed, because it is not an end in itself.
.
Composers and musicians have always been free to disengage with their audiences, and audiences have always had plenty of other things to interest them. You can only “challenge” an audience so much before they start ignoring you, and if the point of music is not finding a suitable balance, or “compromise” if you want to be nasty about it, then what could the point possibly be?